Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:01:45 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Issues induced by former fhs.patch are supposedly fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #247163,
regarding Please support running multiple instances
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
247163: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=247163
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: samba
Severity: wishlist
Please support running multiple instances of samba.
This is useful for things like running totally
separate shares for two different networks, using
a single host.
Something like
- if /etc/samba/smb-*.conf does not exist:
- start a single instance using /etc/samba/smb.conf
- else:
- for $FOO in /etc/samba/smb-FOO.conf:
- start instance, write pid to /var/run/smbd.$FOO.pid, etc.
This assumes daemon mode, of course. If using inetd,
the admin can just execute samba with different command lines
from inetd, depending on which instance the request was for.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
During last years, we worked with upstream to drop nearly all
fhs.patch.
I think that, by doing this, we progressively restored the
funtionality bringed by "lock dir" et al.
Please open a new bug report if that's untrue.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
