Your message dated Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:52:43 +0800
with message-id <1301291563.14648.35.camel@chianamo>
and subject line Re: Bug#614978: iotop: All values 0.0 when using -b parameter
has caused the Debian Bug report #614978,
regarding iotop: All values 0.0 when using -b parameter
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
614978: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614978
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: iotop
Version: 0.4-2
Severity: normal
When using the -b parameter which should enable the batch mode every value is
reset to 0.0 .
Adding other parameters like -P, -a, -n, -k do not change anything.
Saving the output of iotop without -b to a file (containing all the control
characters) works fine.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.37.1 (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages iotop depends on:
ii python [python-ctypes] 2.6.6-3+squeeze5 interactive high-level object-orie
ii python-support 1.0.10 automated rebuilding support for P
iotop recommends no packages.
iotop suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 20:36 +0100, Guillaume Chazarain wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Maier, Uwe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > When you compare that to "top" I must say that my top (part of procps
> > 3.2.8) /does/ deliver values on the first shot. Even with "top -d 3600".
>
> Yes, so does iotop.
> The difference is that top's values are not 0 on the first shot and
> that's because top waits for half a second between the first two
> scrapes:
> http://google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#trXsL2dV-G8/procps-3.2.7/top.c&l=2947
>
> I'd rather not do that in iotop.
I'm closing this bug since there is the -o option to filter out zero IO
processes.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
