Your message dated Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:02:38 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#621549: fixed in jcal 0.1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #621549,
regarding jcal: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
621549: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621549
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jcal
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of the dependency_libs variable.
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html
Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script:
http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt
The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this
post to debian-devel:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html
To generate the list of packages, I've used:
grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1
The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you
have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was
parsed.
jcal appears in this list as a source package because one or more of
the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files.
In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process
behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further
dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your
package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the
dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once
jcal is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you
maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages
are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs.
If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the
dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for
clarification.
--
Neil Williams
=============
[email protected]
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jcal
Source-Version: 0.1.2-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jcal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
jcal_0.1.2-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/j/jcal/jcal_0.1.2-2.debian.tar.gz
jcal_0.1.2-2.dsc
to main/j/jcal/jcal_0.1.2-2.dsc
jcal_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
to main/j/jcal/jcal_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
libjalali-dev_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
to main/j/jcal/libjalali-dev_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
libjalali0_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
to main/j/jcal/libjalali0_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lior Kaplan <[email protected]> (supplier of updated jcal package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:17:31 +0300
Source: jcal
Binary: jcal libjalali0 libjalali-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Arabic Packaging Team
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Lior Kaplan <[email protected]>
Description:
jcal - UNIX-cal-like tool to display Jalali calendar
libjalali-dev - UNIX-cal-like tool to display Jalali calendar
libjalali0 - UNIX-cal-like tool to display Jalali calendar
Closes: 621549
Changes:
jcal (0.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bump standards version to 3.9.1
- Remove *.la files from libjalali-dev to comply with Policy 10.2
(Closes: #621549)
* Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format
Checksums-Sha1:
a1f6ebc652f7afb697d07234f8042d6582afc82e 1151 jcal_0.1.2-2.dsc
88a11de7150e1d9cf28e82ccd374d199d05f4634 2848 jcal_0.1.2-2.debian.tar.gz
87ae6febee3fd52cbe02265259c9342bf0dbcddb 18820 jcal_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
bc94374fdbb9d7eceee996243bd184b47bb2d22a 7056 libjalali0_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
860eb6d014cd852a529e8e75dd80d9322b9102a8 7004 libjalali-dev_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
c799abf707de093fa9a28adcd4308201992c14167968b46cd4421f6294016bd3 1151
jcal_0.1.2-2.dsc
47bfbf146d498e7da5c4804f7fa10d0cf41148059ece19c5033d49298c43a6d5 2848
jcal_0.1.2-2.debian.tar.gz
1562dc37085f5b5b182399992af10574a941feb5cbc243e24556012fcbadc45d 18820
jcal_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
96be3eb9e777663b625f036c1febea39e746873b31dc92a1a6132dadc7466dcb 7056
libjalali0_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
6bdee4b695b6d3b3c6e6b49af3eb58a400ec6b23874aec0ef6bfc77438a354b7 7004
libjalali-dev_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
Files:
d64c4a508d74f5a9261560487965384b 1151 utils extra jcal_0.1.2-2.dsc
069a87611de55eec9000be5bb08e774e 2848 utils extra jcal_0.1.2-2.debian.tar.gz
ba578ed29ef870a6d4719c88c405ddae 18820 utils extra jcal_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
41a99d436a91ad69b6379df90d9a5eac 7056 libs extra libjalali0_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
8a16be9e1802d6c2cd39b11d78509175 7004 libdevel extra
libjalali-dev_0.1.2-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk2eLwIACgkQFViURZnoHaC/iACeNeRBqJMRvP8T4YSjM+21xCGF
460AniPinCYu5fDZTOvBnn0qczI30x5O
=OA7X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
