Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:54:27 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#623375: Please add support for tag "wheezy"
has caused the Debian Bug report #623524,
regarding Please add support for tag "wheezy"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
623524: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623524
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 5.0
Severity: important
Hi.
As of today, reportbug knows about the following tags:
> Do any of the following apply to this report?
>
> 1 d-i This bug is relevant to the development of debian-installer.
> 2 experimental This bug only applies to the experimental branch of Debian.
> 3 ipv6 This bug affects support for Internet Protocol version 6.
> 4 l10n This bug reports a localization/internationalization issue.
> 5 lenny This bug only applies to the lenny release (Debian 5.0).
> 6 lfs This bug affects support for large files (over 2 gigabytes).
> 7 patch You are including a patch to fix this problem.
> 8 sid This bug only applies to the unstable branch of Debian.
> 9 squeeze This bug only applies to the squeeze release.
> 10 upstream This bug applies to the upstream part of the package.
> 11 none
Can you please add "wheezy" too?
Additionally, you could add "(Debian 6.0)" to the description of "Squeeze", as
it's already done for "lenny".
Regards,
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
DEBEMAIL="[email protected]"
DEBFULLNAME="Mehdi Dogguy"
INTERFACE="text"
** /home/mehdi/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "3.39-0.1"
mode expert
ui text
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 0.8.13.1 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii python 2.6.6-12 interactive high-level object-orie
ii python-reportbug 5.0 Python modules for interacting wit
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn debconf-utils <none> (no description available)
pn debsums <none> (no description available)
ii dlocate 1.02 fast alternative to dpkg -L and dp
ii emacs23-bin-common 23.2+1-7 The GNU Emacs editor's shared, arc
ii file 5.04-5+b1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gnupg 1.4.11-3 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii postfix [mail-transport-agen 2.8.2-1+b1 High-performance mail transport ag
ii python-gtk2 2.17.0-4+b1 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
pn python-gtkspell <none> (no description available)
pn python-urwid <none> (no description available)
ii python-vte 1:0.24.3-2 Python bindings for the VTE widget
ii xdg-utils 1.1.0~rc1-2 desktop integration utilities from
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 18:07:24, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 20:22, Mehdi Dogguy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Can you please add "wheezy" too?
>
> I'm fixing it on reportbug, and cloning for the bts which needs update
> too (f.e. [1] and [2])
>
> [1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#tag
> [2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
Done on the www.d.o side (should wait a few hours for the next rebuild before
it's online). BTW, shouldn't we delete any mention of archived distribution on
those pages too?
Regards
David
--- End Message ---
