Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2011 16:58:34 -0500
with message-id <20110703215834.GA10328@elie>
and subject line Re: bash bug #427804 - missing info documentation
has caused the Debian Bug report #427804,
regarding bash: missing info documentation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
427804: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=427804
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bash
Version: 3.1dfsg-8
Severity: normal


The info documentation for bash was removed from bash-doc as a
result of bug #357260, and that bug was then closed.  However, no
non-free bash-info package was ever created.

The bash info documentation is important and useful.  I think it needs
to be restored to Debian as a non-free package.

Thanks,
Andrew.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages bash depends on:
ii  base-files                    4.0.0      Debian base system miscellaneous f
ii  debianutils                   2.19       Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libc6                         2.5-9      GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libncurses5                   5.6-3      Shared libraries for terminal hand

bash recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
affects 466120 + bash bash-doc
quit

Hi,

A. Costa wrote:

> Please ditto, "me too", nag nag, 4th aniversary, etc.

Perhaps you can contact Fernando at [email protected] to help with
packaging Chet's documentation (by giving feedback, testing, making
improvements, whatever seems to be useful).  I'm closing this bug with
this message since I can't see how a change to the bash package itself
could fix it (though see also [1]).

> Of course the bigger problem is not just 'bash'.  Someday there needs
> to be a general solution for problems with unavailable "nonfree" 'info'
> files. For example, many Debian 'man' pages recommend 'info' files,
> that in Debian haven't been available in (four) years.

Please do keep filing bugs for specific problems you run into.  Aside
from (e.g.) manpages-dev advertising functions that require libc-dev
to be usable in programs (which I don't consider a bug), I don't know
of any examples like that.

> We might start by
> never documenting a file that's not there.

A common practice is to ship manpages in the same package that
provides each command; it seems to work well. :)  Improvements always
welcome.

Thanks for your interest, and hope that helps.

Regards,
Jonathan

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/481966


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to