Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 06:49:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328860: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 18:18:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 17 11:18:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253] 
(postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EGhGJ-00077T-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:18:07 -0700
Received: from nahar.localdomain (p83.129.8.89.tisdip.tiscali.de [83.129.8.89])
        by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06631335A3
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:18:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nahar.localdomain)
        by nahar.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
        id 1EGhGB-0000n0-TH
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:17:59 +0200
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: very old package, should this be removed?
Organization: CPU+Mainboard-FAQ: http://www.dch-faq.de/
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:17:59 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libhs
Version: 0.1.3
Severity: serious

Hi,

During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.

I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose
to remove it.
There are no users.

This usually means that your package matched some of the following
criteria:

 [1] Your packages has not had a maintainer upload for more than
     three years.

 [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)

 [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you
     might be MIA 

 [4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than
     100 users with the package installed.

 [5] the package was not released with sarge

and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true.

(**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed
more than one month before the time the check was performed.

After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or
ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it).

The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to
proceed.

Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't
help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel
responsible for their packages without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users. 

Thanks!

Marc


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328860-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 13:53:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 06:53:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EGzY0-0003d7-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 06:49:36 -0700
From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Bug#328860: fixed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 06:49:36 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

     libhs |      0.1.3 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, 
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
 libhs-dev |      0.1.3 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, 
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to