Your message dated Sat, 9 Jul 2011 01:37:44 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug #404551: Documented in the Texinfo manual
has caused the Debian Bug report #404551,
regarding coreutils: ls man page: -l option is not fully described
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
404551: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404551
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.97-5
Severity: minor


The man page for ls says:

 -l     use a long listing format

What "long listing format" means is never described.  Since this format
is not obvious should be described briefly in the man page.  An example
of where it is not obvious is for permissions other than read, write,
and execute.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-xen-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages coreutils depends on:
ii  libacl1                      2.2.41-1    Access control list shared library
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libselinux1                  1.32-3      SELinux shared libraries

coreutils recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tag 404551 wontfix
thanks

I contacted the submitter of this bug, who said he didn't realize the
man page was generated from the output of --help. As such, it seems the
Texinfo manual information is sufficient, and I'm therefore closing this
bug as "wontfix".

-- 
BenoƮt Knecht


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to