Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2011 00:06:28 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Rebuild with python 2.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #643734,
regarding Rebuild with python 2.7Version 5.6.1-6.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
643734: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643734
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-vtk
Severity: normal
Default version of python just changed to 2.7 and python-vtk conflicts
with it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages python-vtk depends on:
ii libavcodec53 4:0.7.1-7
ii libavformat53 4:0.7.1-7
ii libavutil51 4:0.7.1-7
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.1-13
ii libmysqlclient16 5.1.58-1
ii libpq5 9.1.1-1
ii libpython2.6 2.6.7-4
ii libstdc++6 4.6.1-13
ii libswscale2 4:0.7.1-7
ii libvtk5.6 5.6.1-6.1
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-2
ii python 2.7.2-7
ii python-support 1.0.14
ii tcl8.5 8.5.10-1
ii tk8.5 8.5.10-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3
python-vtk recommends no packages.
Versions of packages python-vtk suggests:
ii mayavi2 <none>
ii vtk-doc 5.6.1-6.1
ii vtk-examples 5.6.1-6.1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version 5.6.1-7
* Steve M. Robbins <[email protected]>, 2011-09-28, 23:48:
Default version of python just changed to 2.7 and python-vtk conflicts
with it.
This would have been fixed by a binNMU (thus: no need for a bug report)
if the package didn't FTBFS. Anyway, it's fixed now.
--
Jakub Wilk
--- End Message ---