Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:52:09 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#632725: calibre: Depends on Python 2.7, but not the 
python2.7-foo versions of packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #632725,
regarding calibre: Depends on Python 2.7, but not the python2.7-foo versions of 
packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
632725: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632725
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: calibre
Version: 0.8.2+dfsg-1
Severity: important

Calibre depends on Python 2.7, but the current stable/testing versions
of various other Python modules it needs don't support 2.7. I've run
into this with lxml and imaging in particular, but the others probably
have similar issues. e.g. it should rely on python2.7-lxml, not
python-lxml.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (680, 'unstable'), (670, 'experimental'), (500, 
'stable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages calibre depends on:
ii  calibre-bin    0.8.2+dfsg-1+b1           e-book converter and library manag
ii  imagemagick    8:6.6.0.4-3               image manipulation programs
ii  poppler-utils  0.12.4-1.2                PDF utilitites (based on libpopple
ii  python-beautif 3.1.0.1-2                 error-tolerant HTML parser for Pyt
ii  python-cherryp 3.1.2-1                   Python web development framework -
ii  python-cssutil 0.9.7~b2-2                CSS Cascading Style Sheets parser 
ii  python-dateuti 1.4.1-3                   powerful extensions to the standar
ii  python-dbus    0.83.1-1                  simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  python-django- 0.3.1-1                   A generic tagging application for 
ii  python-encutil 0.9.7~b2-2                Encoding detection collection for 
ii  python-imaging 1.1.7-2                   Python Imaging Library
ii  python-lxml    2.3-0.1+b2                pythonic binding for the libxml2 a
ii  python-mechani 0.1.11-1.1                stateful programmatic web browsing
ii  python-pkg-res 0.6.16-1                  Package Discovery and Resource Acc
ii  python-pyparsi 1.5.2-2                   Python parsing module
ii  python-pypdf   1.12-3                    PDF toolkit implemented solely in 
ii  python-qt4     4.8.3-2+b1                Python bindings for Qt4
ii  python-routes  1.12.3-1                  Routing Recognition and Generation
ii  python2.7      2.7.2-2                   An interactive high-level object-o
ii  ttf-liberation 1.05.2.20091019-4squeeze1 Fonts with the same metrics as Tim
ii  xdg-utils      1.1.0~rc1-2               desktop integration utilities from

Versions of packages calibre recommends:
pn  python-dnspython              <none>     (no description available)

calibre suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Tom Parker [2011-07-05 12:18 +0100]:
> Calibre depends on Python 2.7, but the current stable/testing versions
> of various other Python modules it needs don't support 2.7. I've run
> into this with lxml and imaging in particular, but the others probably
> have similar issues. e.g. it should rely on python2.7-lxml, not
> python-lxml.

The ${python:Provides} are deprecated, so I wouldn't like to introduce
dependencies to pythonX.Y-<lib> to calibre. As lxml in particular
supports 2.7 now, and the default version in Debian is 2.7 as well
now, this is not an issue any more and I close this report.

Thanks,

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to