Your message dated Sun, 25 Sep 2005 06:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144046: fixed in debtags 1.5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2002 13:46:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 22 08:46:08 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from buzz.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.60]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16ze8t-0000HA-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:46:07 -0500
Received: (qmail 13176 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 13:46:02 -0000
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 13:46:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 13173 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 13:46:02 -0000
Received: from avalon.dat.etsit.upm.es (138.100.17.15)
by buzz.etsit.upm.es with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 13:46:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 1313 invoked by uid 1013); 22 Apr 2002 13:46:06 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: general: Sections are not finely grained
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.44
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:46:06 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-22
Severity: important
The current sections layout in Debian is mostly useless due to
the large size of the package database (in woody +- 9000, in potato
+- 4500). This is due to sections not being refined enough (we have not
changed them in the last four years IIRC), thus any package administration
interface is useless for browsing packages since there are too many
packages per section.
As a suggestion, I would use the layout used by either the current Menu
system, the GNOME or KDE proyect for the layout of applications together
with some of our "special" sections (base).
Some samples of how sections could be divided:
admin - system, configuration, package system, security, accounting (logs)
comm - modem, fax,
devel - languages, libraries, compiler, kernel-source
doc - convertors, guides, manpages, admin-doc, devel-doc, games-doc,...
editors - emacs,
games - adventure, arcade, board, tetris, simulation
graphics - themes, video, diagrams, postscript/pdf, viewers,
interpreters - perl, tcltk, python,
mail - client, server, transport
math - spreadsheet, calculator
misc
net - http, ftp, news, telnet, irc, utils, samba, ppp, printer, firewall,
nfs, dns, finger, proxies
news -> should be moved to net
science - astronomy, biology, chemistry
sound - drivers, players, midi,
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux avalon 2.4.18 #1 SMP mié abr 3 12:47:49 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=spanish, LC_CTYPE=spanish
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 144046-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 13:08:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 25 06:08:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJW8s-0008I0-00; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 06:02:06 -0700
From: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#144046: fixed in debtags 1.5.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 06:02:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: debtags
Source-Version: 1.5.1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debtags, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
debtags_1.5.1.dsc
to pool/main/d/debtags/debtags_1.5.1.dsc
debtags_1.5.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debtags/debtags_1.5.1.tar.gz
debtags_1.5.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/debtags/debtags_1.5.1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated debtags package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 14:18:57 +0200
Source: debtags
Binary: debtags
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
debtags - Enables support for package tags
Closes: 144046 322954 326819
Changes:
debtags (1.5.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Updated to build with the cleaned up libtagcoll-dev
* Give better insights on install feature in the manpage. Closes: #322954.
* Set proper umask during update function. Closes: #326819.
* Debtags data are now in the Packages file, so there is now a more finely
grained alternative to sections. Closes: #144046.
* Upload to unstable
Files:
d52fc08855de67db334ed8a6db331b15 634 admin optional debtags_1.5.1.dsc
674a7fa2c2dd6cda90657e7891a26554 694673 admin optional debtags_1.5.1.tar.gz
218012c6576ad1ff51ec19ebf922515f 912774 admin optional debtags_1.5.1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDNpyF9LSwzHl+v6sRAvTgAJ9gekKDKE4Ya71F70zUMEAHY3m2RwCfX0wh
RSPO25UhIQDa3y1d3iUResY=
=LkRa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
