Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:08:05 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#386492: Add an entry to shared MIME info database
has caused the Debian Bug report #386492,
regarding Add an entry to shared MIME info database
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
386492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpatch
Version: 2.0.20
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, why my evolution did not show attached dpatch. Then I
found, that there is no entry made to the shared-mime-info database.
Maybe you could add such an entry (with <sub-class-of
type="text/plain"/>) and then evolution should show such patches too.
I can write a patch if you want. But in this case I need to know, how
the MIME type is called. Maybe text/x-dpatch?
If you agree and an entry should be made to the shared-mime-info database
directly, this report should be reassigned to shared-mime-info.
Regards, Daniel
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (550, 'stable'), (110,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.08060320
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
dpatch depends on no packages.
Versions of packages dpatch recommends:
ii dpkg-dev 1.13.22 package building tools for Debian
ii fakeroot 1.5.10 Gives a fake root environment
ii patchutils 0.2.31-3 Utilities to work with patches
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFALiTdg0kG0+YFBERAh4DAJsHwD/VnR0OvGjs3Ita/OgiXr3j5QCfY/ZD
3TH+tYIujoMqW9DEOAJOgYI=
=/5mL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Am Samstag, den 13.08.2011, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Gergely Nagy:
> For the same reasons as #408826 was tagged wontfix, so shall this be:
> dpatch files can be anything, not just patches. I used to maintain a
> package which had a dpatch that was half a patch, half a shell script
> (patch did some ed magic, unpatch called patch).
Then I'll close it. There is IMO no further need for this request
anymore. I guess there won't be much dpatch files being sent by mail in
the future and MIME detection also has improved a lot in the past.
Regards, Daniel
--- End Message ---
