Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326363: fixed in netkit-ftp-ssl 0.17.12+0.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 20:41:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 13:41:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBILP-0007G8-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:41:03 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA10353
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:41:01 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798A7FD4A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:41:01 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 17169-25 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:41:01 +0200 (MEST) 13913
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:41:01 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j82Kf1ks005121
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:41:01 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:41:01 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ftp-ssl
The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version
will be removed from the archive in the near future.
Please change your build dependencies to
libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev
Please raise the severity of this bug report to serious,
if the package cannot be built with libreadline5-dev.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326363-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 22:40:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 15:40:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKNzd-0000Ly-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:32:09 -0700
From: Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326363: fixed in netkit-ftp-ssl 0.17.12+0.2-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:32:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: netkit-ftp-ssl
Source-Version: 0.17.12+0.2-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netkit-ftp-ssl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
ftp-ssl_0.17.12+0.2-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/netkit-ftp-ssl/ftp-ssl_0.17.12+0.2-5_i386.deb
netkit-ftp-ssl_0.17.12+0.2-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/netkit-ftp-ssl/netkit-ftp-ssl_0.17.12+0.2-5.diff.gz
netkit-ftp-ssl_0.17.12+0.2-5.dsc
to pool/main/n/netkit-ftp-ssl/netkit-ftp-ssl_0.17.12+0.2-5.dsc
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netkit-ftp-ssl package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:07:00 +0100
Source: netkit-ftp-ssl
Binary: ftp-ssl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.17.12+0.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
ftp-ssl - The FTP client with SSL encryption support
Closes: 298063 309388 326363
Changes:
netkit-ftp-ssl (0.17.12+0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Build-Depends against libreadline5-dev (Closes: #326363)
* Fixed typo in manpage (Closes: #298063)
* Fixed needless conflicts (Closes: #309388)
Files:
1132dbe58e725fa7833cf66256642aff 951 net extra netkit-ftp-ssl_0.17.12+0.2-5.dsc
dc77be3c43d00f03152f6b049c1cfb24 5861 net extra
netkit-ftp-ssl_0.17.12+0.2-5.diff.gz
23f80207c3b5646c142b8a4719d04fd2 57816 net extra ftp-ssl_0.17.12+0.2-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBQznDgsSMJEo6oWZwAQIoLQf/WGcmX0G9X0UMcxBm51yv+fltTEtgORw4
9WV7dDRIbwxvzhxP53hbPEwmlNDHY+IwYsX5i/D2EtuYXk4s7g6QBrap64jQQkYv
jEX6Y2GOYhk5UmKeot+F653NFNpYmEcxhsxOZWkPPtQJb49Zsxe4ZmUYjwv/VXbD
lybac0IyZI8tUeDeQfJR0bQthOCqD2hJB/Yb7sSBXvId5hIiNQLnT+t/vLH6+V8v
XjQoSRhhsiopQFG76IRoiyk6GK5E16aqt5jIK6oIt5OyTABxGuL7fbjzMmUoWZ3A
veOzxinTcyRAfJL81U3n8GpEjRZKdTa9mxZuxff9tsUR/bUDaSBKwg==
=FmLb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
