Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:18:42 +0900
with message-id <87ipm36s0t.dancerj%[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#646477: cowbuilder: please support BASEPATH and 
BUILDPLACE on different devices
has caused the Debian Bug report #646477,
regarding cowbuilder: please support BASEPATH and BUILDPLACE on different 
devices
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
646477: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cowbuilder
Version: 0.65
Severity: important
Usertags: debian-packaging

Hi there!

cowbuilder always wants to create hardlinks, thus BUILDPLACE can not be
on a different device than BASEPATH.  This is basically the same problem
as for APTCACHEHARDLINK:
=====
root@gismo:/home/luca# grep APTCACHEHARDLINK /usr/share/pbuilder/pbuilderrc 
/etc/pbuilderrc
/usr/share/pbuilder/pbuilderrc:APTCACHEHARDLINK="yes"
/etc/pbuilderrc:APTCACHEHARDLINK=no

root@gismo:/home/luca# cowbuilder --update --basepath 
/home/luca/chroot/base-sid.cow/
[...]
cp: cannot create hard link `/var/cache/pbuilder/build//cow.20491/.ilist' to 
`/home/luca/chroot/base-sid.cow/.ilist': Invalid cross-device link
Failed cowcopy.

root@gismo:/home/luca# 
=====

Please note that I firstly discovered it because I set my BUILDPLACE on
a tmpfs, which generates as well the error above.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-rc7-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cowbuilder depends on:
ii  cowdancer  0.65   
ii  libc6      2.13-21
ii  pbuilder   0.203  

cowbuilder recommends no packages.

cowbuilder suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Attachment: pgpjeZ1i1vrc3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
There's no point in using cowbuilder if you aren't using
hardlinks; thus no point in supporting such set up of cross-device
BUILDPLACE. Use pbuilder for that purpose.

At Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:13:17 +0200,
Luca Capello wrote:
> 
> Package: cowbuilder
> Version: 0.65
> Severity: important
> Usertags: debian-packaging
> 
> Hi there!
> 
> cowbuilder always wants to create hardlinks, thus BUILDPLACE can not be
> on a different device than BASEPATH.  This is basically the same problem
> as for APTCACHEHARDLINK:
> =====
> root@gismo:/home/luca# grep APTCACHEHARDLINK /usr/share/pbuilder/pbuilderrc 
> /etc/pbuilderrc
> /usr/share/pbuilder/pbuilderrc:APTCACHEHARDLINK="yes"
> /etc/pbuilderrc:APTCACHEHARDLINK=no
> 
> root@gismo:/home/luca# cowbuilder --update --basepath 
> /home/luca/chroot/base-sid.cow/
> [...]
> cp: cannot create hard link `/var/cache/pbuilder/build//cow.20491/.ilist' to 
> `/home/luca/chroot/base-sid.cow/.ilist': Invalid cross-device link
> Failed cowcopy.
> 
> root@gismo:/home/luca# 
> =====
> 
> Please note that I firstly discovered it because I set my BUILDPLACE on
> a tmpfs, which generates as well the error above.
> 
> Thx, bye,
> Gismo / Luca
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: wheezy/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-rc7-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> 
> Versions of packages cowbuilder depends on:
> ii  cowdancer  0.65   
> ii  libc6      2.13-21
> ii  pbuilder   0.203  
> 
> cowbuilder recommends no packages.
> 
> cowbuilder suggests no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to