Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329081: fixed in kernel-package 9.008
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 12:50:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 05:50:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHL6E-0005To-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 05:50:22 -0700
Received: from port-195-158-179-11.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.179.11]
helo=hattusa.textio)
by mx01.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1EHL5j-00015j-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:49:51 +0200
Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EHL5j-0001DS-Ec
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:49:51 +0200
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:49:51 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fix netboot for mips ELF32 arc firmware
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
From: Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: kernel-package
Version: 9.007
Tags: patch
Hello,
one more update for mips, some machines can run a 64bit kernel but the
firmware expects ELF32.
Thiemo
--- rules.old 2005-08-31 18:11:23.000000000 +0200
+++ rules 2005-09-18 22:08:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -698,8 +698,18 @@ endif
##### mips
ifeq ($(strip $(architecture)),mips)
- # SGI ELF32
+ # SGI ELF32: 64bit kernel, but firmware needs ELF32 for netboot
+ # (the on-disk loader could do both).
ifneq (,$(filter r4k-ip22 r5k-ip22 r5k-ip32 r10k-ip32,$(strip
$(KPKG_SUBARCH))))
+ ifneq ($(shell if [ $(VERSION) -ge 2 ] && [ $(PATCHLEVEL) -ge 6 ] && \
+ [ $(SUBLEVEL) -ge 11 ]; then echo new; \
+ elif [ $(VERSION) -ge 2 ] && [ $(PATCHLEVEL) -ge 7 ]; then \
+ echo new; \
+ elif [ $(VERSION) -ge 3 ]; then echo new; fi),)
+ kimage := vmlinux.32
+ else
+ kimage := vmlinux
+ endif
loaderdep = arcboot
loader = arcboot
loaderdoc =
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329081-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 18:09:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 11:09:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKgFz-00048E-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:15 -0700
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#329081: fixed in kernel-package 9.008
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:15 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: kernel-package
Source-Version: 9.008
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kernel-package, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kernel-package_9.008.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_9.008.dsc
kernel-package_9.008.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_9.008.tar.gz
kernel-package_9.008_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_9.008_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kernel-package
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:22:37 -0500
Source: kernel-package
Binary: kernel-package
Architecture: source all
Version: 9.008
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
kernel-package - A utility for building Linux kernel related Debian packages.
Closes: 327361 328784 329081 329373
Changes:
kernel-package (9.008) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bug fix: "xen.postinst contains illegal sed command", thanks to
Michael Tautschnig (Closes: #329373).
* Bug fix: "Fix netboot for mips ELF32 arc firmware", thanks to Thiemo
Seufer (Closes: #329081).
* Bug fix: "kernel-package: powerpc kernel packages don't remove
cleanly", thanks to Eric Cooper (Closes: #327361).
* Bug fix: "Give warnings during preconfigure, not during install",
thanks to Bas Wijnen (Closes: #328784).
Files:
9b737ca5e41f2d64a1dc3a0151f6c999 483 misc optional kernel-package_9.008.dsc
6251e3f4c603c8c6e7a521aec4a2e13f 557622 misc optional
kernel-package_9.008.tar.gz
69ab9cca728a60974942008129b2f10f 365906 misc optional
kernel-package_9.008_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDOrhOIbrau78kQkwRAhg8AKCVd/yT6KIejL5YUPNYV3/Y6HdNXACg+zRA
KugCqk6k6XihxCIKf6lYRfU=
=WVUI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
