Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:52:29 -0800
with message-id
<CAHjiUbq=qgm2VumYL+=xvivbm56l1oe6lyih0mc9rmvu-8n...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line "for same quality" in extended descriptions
has caused the Debian Bug report #651570,
regarding [libwebp] "for same quality" in extended descriptions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
651570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651570
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libwebp
Version: 0.1.3-2
Severity: minor
Extended descriptions contain:
More than 30% extra gain over optimized JPEG, for same quality, is not
unusual.
The noun group "same quality" is missing a determiner. The zero article
does not apply. It should become "the same quality".
Note that the meaning of that sentence is unclear. What is a 30% extra
gain over some format?
By the way, please use full sentences in extended descriptions.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Description was provided verbatim from upstream, and as maintainer I am
choosing not to correct this minor grammar mistake. I am also not going to
expand the description of performance vs. JPEG, but you are welcome to
read more here if you wish.
http://code.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_study.html
--- End Message ---
