Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:45:19 +0900
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line ibus-chewing uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #653225,
regarding ibus-chewing: New upstream tar available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
653225: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653225
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ibus-chewing
Version: 1.3.9.2-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
New upstream 1.3.10 is available.
It seems it is packaged with non standard tar (star not in Debian).
It also moved cmake-fedora out of tree to wget.
I have worked on this (I see just half done commit on vcs for long. I
guess I solved it.) I am pushing this to git archive. Thus patch tag.
I also commited pristine-tar.
Should I upload this? Or will any one of you?
It is lintian clean now.
This may solve 2 outstanding bugs.
Osamu
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (10, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages ibus-chewing depends on:
ii gconf2 3.2.3-1
ii ibus 1.4.0-3
ii libc6 2.13-23
ii libchewing3 0.3.3-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.30.2-4
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.8-2
ii libibus-1.0-0 1.4.0-3
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-4
ii libxtst6 2:1.2.0-4
ibus-chewing recommends no packages.
ibus-chewing suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.10+clean-1
Hi,
I realize the recent uploads has been by Asias He and I knew he is busy
and gave me generic OK for package update previously.
So I uploaded.
I realized asias was asking upstream to make this source tree buildable
by utself but no positive response.
I found just adding that small set of separated code as patch works.
I also realized upstream is using BSDTAR or STAR. So it gives funny
message. Also, I find it dirty to ship VIM editor's swap files *.swo
These are clean-ups I did.
I am closing this bug report.
Osamu
--- End Message ---
