Your message dated Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:47:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330668: postgresql-doc: prerm script incorrect
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 06:52:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 23:52:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay-bv.club-internet.fr [194.158.96.102]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKsHm-0003wr-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:52:54 -0700
Received: from mcfm2.mcfm (l02v-213-44-165-239.d2.club-internet.fr
[213.44.165.239])
by relay-bv.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4246C25606
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:52:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mcfm2.mcfm (Postfix, from userid 5439)
id 8CFAF532DD; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:52:51 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: postgresql-doc: prerm script incorrect
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:52:51 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: postgresql-doc
Version: 7.5.9
Severity: normal
When I do "dpkg --purge postgresql-doc" I obtain an error due to the fact that
the prerm script return an error.
I solve the problem by inserting "exit" as second line in the script.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 330668-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 11:48:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 04:48:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from box79162.elkhouse.de [213.9.79.162]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ELfqZ-0003mN-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 04:48:07 -0700
Received: by box79162.elkhouse.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 51E571F893F; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:47:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:47:35 +0200
From: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#330668: postgresql-doc: prerm script incorrect
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Version: 7.5.1
Hi Francois!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-01 8:43 +0200]:
> When I discover the problem there were a prerm script whith same content =
as the
> one of Sarge version (7.4.7) and I have not seen that was not correct bec=
ause
> transitional package has no such script. The sarge script was not "partic=
ularly
> prone to errors" but it return an error if it is executed without postgre=
sql
> doc installed.
Ah, now I understand. So you the prerm failed while you upgraded from
the Sarge version. Hmm, too bad, I can't fix the Sarge version since
it is not a security or data loss bug.=20
> I made some test to try reproduce my problem i.e. installing sarge
> package and upgrading to transitionnal package but all things works
> well. Sorry I am unable to reproduce the bug so you can close it
> with the tag "non reproductible".
Thank you for checking again, so it seems it does not bite too many
people. I mark it as fixed in the Etch version.
Thanks,
Martin
--=20
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDPndXDecnbV4Fd/IRAl26AJ0QYixa9LcQ56ttAUgQfN2ov0RcXACfWbrx
etltHXtTC14ufpyH4pkjDWI=
=YP//
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
