Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2005 10:09:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of aptitude 0.3.4-1 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2004 11:57:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 30 04:57:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CCzYz-0002lJ-00; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:57:33 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4EB895D71
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:57:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (80-219-173-32.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.173.32])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id D5A87895D6B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6FB35201C96; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:57:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:57:31 +0200
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rewrites config file, resets permissions
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.99.3
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.8-1-k7 i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please spare me
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.5-2
Severity: minor
I would assume that I am not the only one starting aptitude through
sudo. The problem is that upon exiting, aptitude unlinks
~/.aptitude/config and writes a new copy. However, because of sudo,
this is relative to the calling user's homedirectory, not root's.
Thus, one ends up with a root-owned config file under a user
homedirectory. In combination with a 077 umask, this makes it
impossible for the calling user to call aptitude subsequently.
Furthermore, when the config files are managed by subversion (as in
my case), it becomes impossible to sync them with the repository.
I suggest thus to not unlink the config file but to simply truncate
it instead.
Thanks,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB.UTF-8
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6. 0.5.27 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-4sarge1 GCC support library
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal =
hand
ii libsigc++-1.2-5c102 1.2.5-1 Type-safe Signal Framework for=
C++
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-6sarge1.2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
--=20
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBW/SrIgvIgzMMSnURAiHrAJ42xkKotUALTwGAUk4O9dwzCBXB9QCcCSvL
avVJZtFootARaTe/2C1BtHI=
=BQl1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 272409-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 08:09:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 01:09:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 5301d.unt0.torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de (torres.zugschlus.de)
[217.151.83.1] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ELyv0-0006b5-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 01:09:58 -0700
Received: from lefler.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de ([192.168.130.38])
by torres.zugschlus.de with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.53)
id 1ELyux-0005qo-0N; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:09:55 +0200
Received: from mh by lefler.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ELyuw-00080G-FN; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:09:54 +0200
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 10:09:54 +0200
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fixed in upload of aptitude 0.3.4-1 to experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Spam-Score: (-----) -5.9
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 20
Version: 0.3.4-1
tagging bugs as fixed in 0.3.4-1, as cleared with dburrows on IRC.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
