Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:21:03 -0600
with message-id <20120121222103.GA23764@burratino>
and subject line Re: bugs.debian.org: `pkgreport.cgi?src=' doesn't show bugs 
reported for source packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #510166,
regarding bugs.debian.org: `pkgreport.cgi?src=' doesn't show bugs reported for 
source packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
510166: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510166
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: important

Hi,

Bug #510093 which was reported for source package iceape-l10n (there's
no binary package with this name) isn't listed under the "Bugs in source 
package iceape-l10n" page:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=iceape-l10n
which mentions only bugs #459701 and #499443.

(However it is listed in "Bugs in package iceape-l10n" at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=iceape-l10n ).


Regards,
Robert


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/pdksh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Don Armstrong wrote:

> Because it's assigned to the binary package iceape-l10n, which isn't
> part of the source package iceape-l10n.
>
> That said, I am going to change it to support showing bugs assigned to
> the binary package of the same name when selecting bugs in the source
> package when there isn't a real binary package of the same name.

This seems to be fixed (e.g., "bugs.debian.org/src:linux-2.6" gives lots
and lots of bugs filed against the fictitious linux-2.6 binary
package).  Thanks!


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to