Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:07:19 +0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#628708: ipxe: please provide rom images for qemu
has caused the Debian Bug report #628708,
regarding ipxe: please provide rom images for qemu
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
628708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ipxe
Version: 1.0.0+git-1.293e34-2
Severity: wishlist
Please provide rtl8139.rom e1000-82540em.rom virtio-net.rom rtl8029.rom
pcnet32.rom and ne2k_isa.rom padded to 64k so that they can be loaded as
rom images into qemu/kvm directly.
Also a package that provides etherboot-qemu and symlinks the images in
place where qemu fids it would be helpful.
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (510, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (200,
'experimental'), (111, 'oldstable'), (107, 'natty')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 03.02.2012 01:51, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Excerpts from Michael Tokarev's message of Thu Feb 02 22:03:37 +0100 2012:
>> As far as I can see, qemu works with default boot roms provided by
>> ipxe package just fine. Why do you say some additional padding is
>> necessary?
>
> That was suggested by some guide on using roms with qemu.
>
> By now qemu works without additional padding so a separate package is no
> longer required.
Ok, thank you for the information. Closing the bugreport.
Thanks!
/mjt
--- End Message ---
