Your message dated Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:30:56 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#661901: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #342159,
regarding acm4: Is this package necessary?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
342159: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=342159
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: acm4
Severity: wishlist
It appears that acm (version 5) is a superior replacement for acm4.
Is there really a good reason to keep acm4 around, or is it perhaps a
good idea to drop it?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.7-20+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package acm4 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/661901
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
