Your message dated Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:04:22 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#659779: Processed: found 659779 in 2.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #659779,
regarding expeyes: doesn't use invoke-rc.d
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
659779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: expeyes
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package starts processes
where it shouldn't. This is very probably due to not using invoke-rc.d
as mandated by policy 9.3.3.2. This is seriously disturbing! ;-)
See http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.3.3
and /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.invoke-rc.d.gz as well
as /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.policy-rc.d.gz
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Selecting previously unselected package expeyes.
(Reading database ... 14017 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking expeyes (from .../expeyes_2.0.0-1_all.deb) ...
Setting up expeyes (2.0.0-1) ...
udev requires a mounted sysfs, not started ... failed!
failed!
dpkg: error processing expeyes (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
configured to not write apport reports
Errors were encountered while processing:
expeyes
expeyes.postinst uses the 'service' command instead of 'invoke-rc.d' and
disrespects policy-rc.d that way, trying to start udev in a chroot ...
cheers,
Andreas
expeyes_2.0.0-1.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.0-2
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 09:19:29AM +0000, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> Hello Piuparts master,
>
> can you document how you found bug #659779 again in exepeyes, version
> 2.0.0.-2 ?
expeyes 2.0.0-2 installs nicely in a chroot and piuparts reports no
problems, so re-closing this bug as part of the Cambridge BSP.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
