Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:17:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331650: fixed in jline 0.9.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 12:00:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 05:00:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EMlTG-0002ht-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:00:35 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Oct 2005 12:00:03 -0000
Received: from gandalf.igf.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (EHLO 
gandalf.igf.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE) [131.173.78.181]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 04 Oct 2005 14:00:03 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1941950
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: jline: libant1.6-java to ant transition
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:00:00 +0000
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: jline
Severity: normal

Hi Peter,

although I assume you know it already, I file this bug to 
keep track of the transition.

ant has been reorganized and moved to main. Therefore
libant1.6-java will be removed from the archive in the future.

Please updated your package to build-depend on ant instead
of libant1.6-java with your next upload.

Please note that ant has not the same content compared to the old
ant binary from contrib. ant only contains the core tasks now and
if you depend on junit or another optional tasks for building
you also need to depend on ant-optional.

For details and packages to be transitioned:
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/ant/

Regards,

Wolfgang


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 331650-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 20:20:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 13:20:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ENFhW-0007Gb-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:17:18 -0700
From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#331650: fixed in jline 0.9.1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:17:18 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: jline
Source-Version: 0.9.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jline, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

jline_0.9.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/j/jline/jline_0.9.1-2.diff.gz
jline_0.9.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/j/jline/jline_0.9.1-2.dsc
libjline-java-doc_0.9.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/j/jline/libjline-java-doc_0.9.1-2_all.deb
libjline-java_0.9.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/j/jline/libjline-java_0.9.1-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated jline package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  5 Oct 2005 20:24:25 +0200
Source: jline
Binary: libjline-java-doc libjline-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libjline-java - Java library for handling console input
 libjline-java-doc - documentation for JLine
Closes: 331650
Changes: 
 jline (0.9.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Converted patches to simple-patchsys
   * Changed build dependency to ant (closes: #331650)
   * Changed maintainer to Debian Java Maintainers
   * Don't install AUTHORS file
Files: 
 6631e4243f60eb612c1b94e202eb06d3 716 libs optional jline_0.9.1-2.dsc
 87731b79a40bbd97497de5deb79dbb1b 2774 libs optional jline_0.9.1-2.diff.gz
 4a074593a19aff483e097c0d2e43e66a 41788 libs optional 
libjline-java_0.9.1-2_all.deb
 1dbffe0d2e09d48a6f9edc4d6c622c09 317174 doc optional 
libjline-java-doc_0.9.1-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDRCJ8TTx8oVVPtMYRAjV2AJ4nppqrGQVRCLRp0/nw8756ud5KrgCdEugi
KV7k4BnAm1DHzLS+JWwZePs=
=nayh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to