Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:35:28 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line No longer affects release goal
has caused the Debian Bug report #622418,
regarding libopensync-plugin-kdepim: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying 
dependency_libs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
622418: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622418
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libopensync-plugin-kdepim
Version: 0.22-4
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: la-file-removal

To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of the dependency_libs variable.

http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html

Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script:

http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt

The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this
post to debian-devel:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html

To generate the list of packages, I've used:

grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1

The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you
have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was
parsed.

libopensync-plugin-kdepim appears in this list as a source package
because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages)
contain .la files.

In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process
behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further
dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your
package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the
dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once
libopensync-plugin-kdepim is fixed, the process will repeat and other
packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is
important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs.

If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the
dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for
clarification.
-- 

Neil Williams
=============
[email protected]
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
notfound 622418 0.22-4
quit

Although the affected version is in stable, the release goal only
applies to Wheezy and sid and libopensync-plugin-kdepim has been
removed from those suites.

Closing the bug.

-- 


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

Attachment: pgpZjZHtnd6Ql.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to