Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:02:25 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#668560: fixed in exuberant-ctags 1:5.9~svn20110310-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #668560,
regarding exuberant-ctags 'etags' should have lower priority than Emacs 'etags'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
668560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668560
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: exuberant-ctags
Version: 1:5.9~svn20110310-2
Severity: normal
Currently, exuberant-ctags has higher priority than emacs for the
'etags' executable. Since etags stands for 'emacs tags', it seems
that it would make more sense for the emacs executable to take
priority; if a user desires to use exuberant-ctags they can always
use ctags -e.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers oneiric-updates
APT policy: (500, 'oneiric-updates'), (500, 'oneiric-security'), (500,
'oneiric')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-17-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages exuberant-ctags depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-20ubuntu5.1 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
exuberant-ctags recommends no packages.
Versions of packages exuberant-ctags suggests:
ii emacs 23.3+1-1ubuntu4 The GNU Emacs editor (metapackage)
ii emacs 22.2-0ubuntu9 The GNU Emacs editor (with GTK+ 2.
ii emacs 23.3+1-1ubuntu4 The GNU Emacs editor (with GTK+ us
ii vim 2:7.3.154+hg~74503f6ee649-2ubuntu3 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor
ii vim-g 2:7.3.154+hg~74503f6ee649-2ubuntu3 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor -
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: exuberant-ctags
Source-Version: 1:5.9~svn20110310-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
exuberant-ctags, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.debian.tar.gz
to main/e/exuberant-ctags/exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.debian.tar.gz
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.dsc
to main/e/exuberant-ctags/exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.dsc
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4_i386.deb
to main/e/exuberant-ctags/exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <[email protected]> (supplier of updated exuberant-ctags package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:42:14 +0100
Source: exuberant-ctags
Binary: exuberant-ctags
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:5.9~svn20110310-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Colin Watson <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <[email protected]>
Description:
exuberant-ctags - build tag file indexes of source code definitions
Closes: 668560
Changes:
exuberant-ctags (1:5.9~svn20110310-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Simplify alternatives handling. update-alternatives doesn't need so
much babysitting these days.
* Reduce the etags alternative's priority to 10 so that it's less than
that of emacs (closes: #668560).
* Upgrade to debhelper v9 and its new arrangements for honouring
dpkg-buildflags output.
* Append CPPFLAGS to CFLAGS, since the upstream build system doesn't
honour CPPFLAGS. This enables -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 with Debian's default
dpkg-buildflags configuration.
Checksums-Sha1:
e66bfe3edf65afb52f7fbe0ad807c3c0c3e015d0 1876
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.dsc
3fc6d30e8eab23ac34c4ce64412473266948b6d6 11184
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.debian.tar.gz
34c6038f7df97366812a28e219fea54598ed4b49 151320
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
7a290817b1d9d7cd58aecbeef79554722b31a6d654892b91db0c87083237a445 1876
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.dsc
1b3387127bd1f7302ea9c83c2b73b425597a602b6f6bd8c73895285956822dea 11184
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.debian.tar.gz
47365cb1ca42d495263eb3f8ec4d63bd67301d19e949e8deb8153980c0a32470 151320
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4_i386.deb
Files:
7612d35c1fecb392b91e44da9245fdfb 1876 editors optional
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.dsc
b84197e7ecc8f5d61e76e13f48a1a710 11184 editors optional
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4.debian.tar.gz
61c280395c4a6c0a108f52c21ee801f2 151320 editors optional
exuberant-ctags_5.9~svn20110310-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Colin Watson <[email protected]> -- Debian developer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=0wdg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
