Your message dated Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:48:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This is exactly what newvserver do now.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 07:57:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 00:57:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip-80-113-0-2.ip.prioritytelecom.net (mail1.office.zx.nl)
[80.113.0.2]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQhQi-0008G9-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:57:56 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([192.168.1.79]) by mail1.office.zx.nl
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:57:24 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0524179070=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: vserver-debiantools: newvserver deprecated
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:57:21 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2005 07:57:24.0649 (UTC)
FILETIME=[BF981190:01C54AFE]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============0524179070==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: vserver-debiantools
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The newvserver command is deprecated. The new command is:
"vserver vstest build -m debootstrap -- -d sarge"
The "-- -d sarge" part is needed, otherwise it tries to install the deb31
release which doesn't exist.
The newvserver command fails to install if grsecurity, pax and vserver
patches are applied. The build command does work with the right sysctl
settings.
Maybe something for the docs:
These sysctl settings are needed to setup a new vserver on a grsecurity enabled
system:
kernel.grsecurity.chroot_caps=0
kernel.grsecurity.chroot_deny_mount=0
kernel.grsecurity.chroot_deny_mknod=0
kernel.grsecurity.chroot_deny_chmod=0
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCb0XhSTv4ppQVDnwRAokrAJ9kkrnqL8miUw9THkjf7Lp4J8BKUACgqhJi
V95/acUEdCUMA9ncDV2v15Y=
=vVC3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--===============0524179070==
Content-Type: text/x-c++; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="vserver-debiantools-deprecated-warning.patch"
diff -rub vserver-debiantools-0.1.10.orig/newvserver.sh
vserver-debiantools-0.1.10/newvserver.sh
--- vserver-debiantools-0.1.10.orig/newvserver.sh 2005-03-12
16:28:27.000000000 +0100
+++ vserver-debiantools-0.1.10/newvserver.sh 2005-04-27 09:48:25.000000000
+0200
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@
# Install a virtual debian server (vserver) from a debian HTTP/FTP archive
#
# ----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+echo "This tool is deprecated, The new command is:"
+echo "vserver <vserver> build -m debootstrap -- -d sarge"
+
# Configurable items:
# Root directory of your virtual servers (probably shouldn't change this)
--===============0524179070==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306526-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2005 19:48:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 09 12:48:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-adt-5.ataco.se (bixbite.opalsys.net) [213.115.168.248]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOhA5-0003ja-00; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 12:48:45 -0700
Received: from ola by bixbite.opalsys.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EOh9a-0003X7-QC
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:48:14 +0200
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:48:14 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This is exactly what newvserver do now.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
So I'l closing this bug.
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
