Your message dated Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:17:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314976: fixed in directvnc 0.7.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2005 19:49:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 19 12:49:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-adt-5.ataco.se (bixbite.opalsys.net) [213.115.168.248]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dk5n3-0004pd-00; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:49:10 -0700
Received: from ola by bixbite.opalsys.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dk5Z2-0006AT-Vc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:34:41 +0200
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:34:40 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: New directfb upstream version, soname change]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: directvn
Severity: wishlist
I'll add this as a wishlist bug as I have to remember doing this.
Regards,
// Ola
----- Forwarded message from Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:21:51 +0200
From: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New directfb upstream version, soname change
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Spamcheck-provider: Checked for spam by opalsys.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi dear "rdependants", =)
I'll be uploading directfb 0.9.22 to sid for 21th of June dinstall
run. You can find current version in experimental, the one I'll
upload will be basically the same plus some manpages.
So please try to build your packages against that version and be
prepared to upload a new version once I upload mine. If there's
something wrong, FTBFS etc, I can postpone the upload.
regards,
guillem
----- End forwarded message -----
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 314976-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2005 20:20:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 09 13:20:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOhbe-0000ny-00; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:17:14 -0700
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#314976: fixed in directvnc 0.7.5-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:17:14 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: directvnc
Source-Version: 0.7.5-7
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
directvnc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
directvnc_0.7.5-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/directvnc/directvnc_0.7.5-7.diff.gz
directvnc_0.7.5-7.dsc
to pool/main/d/directvnc/directvnc_0.7.5-7.dsc
directvnc_0.7.5-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/directvnc/directvnc_0.7.5-7_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated directvnc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:46:23 +0200
Source: directvnc
Binary: directvnc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.5-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
directvnc - VNC client using the framebuffer as display
Closes: 314976
Changes:
directvnc (0.7.5-7) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Rebuild against libdirectfb-0.9-22, closes: #314976.
* Updated standards version to 3.6.2.
Files:
c197f1284abaec3227b562532444396b 649 misc optional directvnc_0.7.5-7.dsc
31a6ee420f72a33df506643cbbd72896 22281 misc optional directvnc_0.7.5-7.diff.gz
b4231d9fe872d0beb621f8742b25bf3e 26252 misc optional directvnc_0.7.5-7_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDSXR2GKGxzw/lPdkRArzJAJ96kyLcvB81sYJuGIy/8ifzL64Q2ACeO+Zx
HayI00kAaBhbq1WdToZFCDA=
=oFs6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
