Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#277228: fixed in gmoo 0.5.6-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2004 02:21:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27 19:21:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kmccarty.student.princeton.edu (arcturus.localdomain) 
[140.180.135.112] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C0sqb-0005gq-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:21:41 -0700
Received: from kmccarty by arcturus.localdomain with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
        id 1C0sq6-0007Tn-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:21:10 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gmoo: Incorrect use of "it's" in package description
Reply-To: Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:21:10 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gmoo
Version: 0.5.6-7
Severity: minor

Hello,

The package gmoo uses the contraction "it's" in the
Description field of its control file in what appears to be an
incorrect way.  Recall that "it's" is a contraction for "it is" or
"it has", and any other use (for instance, as a possessive) is not
grammatically correct English.  Hypothetical examples:

- XMMS is cool.  It's one of the best ...   [correct, "It is"]
- XMMS is cool.  It's been rated highly ... [correct, "It has"]
- XMMS is cool.  It's features include ...  [wrong]
- XMMS is cool.  Its features include ...   [correct, possessive]

Using "it's" and "its" correctly is in your best interest, since
incorrect usage may cause someone browsing the package descriptions to
have a bad first impression of that package.

Package-specific note:
There are two occurrences of "it's" that should be "its".

Please note that this is a mass bug filing; it was discussed on
debian-devel in the thread starting here:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/08/msg01626.html

If you need to contact me, please respect the Reply-To header or use
my email address (in the .sig), as this bug report was sent from a
machine with no capability to receive email.

Best regards,

-- 
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/    Princeton University
GPG public key ID: 4F83C751                 Princeton, NJ 08544

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 277228-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2005 08:08:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 01:08:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EOsbo-0004UJ-00; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:02:08 -0700
From: Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#277228: fixed in gmoo 0.5.6-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:02:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gmoo
Source-Version: 0.5.6-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gmoo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gmoo_0.5.6-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gmoo/gmoo_0.5.6-8.diff.gz
gmoo_0.5.6-8.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gmoo/gmoo_0.5.6-8.dsc
gmoo_0.5.6-8_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gmoo/gmoo_0.5.6-8_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gmoo package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:47:30 +0200
Source: gmoo
Binary: gmoo
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.5.6-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gmoo       - a GTK+ based MOO (and MUD) Client
Closes: 268511 277228 333030
Changes: 
 gmoo (0.5.6-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed package description typo's (closes: #268511, #277228).
   * Removed some superfluous build-depends.
   * Make sure the build uses imlib11-dev and also gdk-imlib11-dev
     by build-depending on libgnome-dev (closes: #333030).
Files: 
 1bf25c6c2c8e1e61d7bb5c7cc95d7c57 654 net optional gmoo_0.5.6-8.dsc
 39a57d2527293b7ba11d1f09c10a6350 134059 net optional gmoo_0.5.6-8.diff.gz
 f1fa16a6b94a9c4a909e5a63e78b4828 179596 net optional gmoo_0.5.6-8_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDSh43JBBhylAGQYERAop6AJ9HvQO3TDGXiuKMEl/b7QrAB4c1XACeP/uQ
XMPFXFeyoPEZye3UNYPLJsY=
=90md
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to