Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:40:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ntop: openssl transition (libssl0.9.7 -> libssl0.9.8)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2005 11:00:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 04:00:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-adt-5.ataco.se (bixbite.opalsys.net) [213.115.168.248]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOvOO-00013j-00; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:00:29 -0700
Received: from ola by bixbite.opalsys.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EOvNq-0002Xi-3p
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:59:54 +0200
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:59:54 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openssl transition (libssl0.9.7 -> libssl0.9.8)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ntop
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Just change dep and rebuild.
Regards,
// Ola
----- Forwarded message from Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:26:18 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ntop: openssl transition (libssl0.9.7 -> libssl0.9.8)
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Spamcheck-provider: Checked for spam by opalsys.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[This is an automatically generated mail.]
Hi,
openssl version 0.9.8 has been recently uploaded to unstable. The ABI
has changed between versions 0.9.7 and 0.9.8, which means that each
package that depends on libssl0.9.7 needs to be rebuild, so that it
depends on libssl0.9.8.
You are receiving this mail because you have a package in unstable that
still depends on libssl0.9.7. It should be rebuilt against the latest
openssl, so that libssl0.9.7 can safely be removed from the archive.
To achieve that:
- if your package build-depend on libssl-dev, please make your package
simply build-depend on libssl-dev (>= 0.9.8-1)
- if the dependency on libssl0.9.7 comes from a library, please wait
until this library is transitioned, and add a versioned
build-dependency on this library.
Do not hesitate to contact me if there are any problems or difficulties.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
----- End forwarded message -----
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 333098-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2005 18:41:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 11:41:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-adt-5.ataco.se (bixbite.opalsys.net) [213.115.168.248]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EP2aU-0001Aq-00; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:41:26 -0700
Received: from ola by bixbite.opalsys.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EP2Zs-0006jP-Lj; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:40:48 +0200
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:40:48 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntop: openssl transition (libssl0.9.7 -> libssl0.9.8)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:03:13PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> [This is an automatically generated mail.]
>
> Hi again,
>
> I have been asked by the release team to cancel my previous mail about
> the libssl transition, as another solution has been found since the last
> discussion on debian-devel. It seems that openssl version 0.9.7 will
> be reuploaded so that the transition could be delayed.
>
> So please ignore my previous mail, and sorry to have bothered you.
>
> Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any question.
Ok, thanks.
Next time, please file a bug insteas so I do not forget about it ;)
I know you want to be polite and not bug me unnecessarily but to
me bugs is not a problem (just a help for me to remember).
Regards,
// Ola
> Regards,
> Aurelien
>
> --
> .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
> : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
> `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
