Your message dated Sat, 2 Jun 2012 00:03:43 +0900
with message-id <20120601150343.GB21617@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#675036: RM: mecab-ipadic/2.7.0+20070801-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #675036,
regarding RM: mecab-ipadic/2.7.0+20070801-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
675036: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675036
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: rm

Please remove ipadic packages in unstable and testing of non-free
archive to complete non-free to main transition.

This mecab-ipadic package was originally uploaded to the non-free area
following the precedent of ipadic.  After careful review, the new ipadic
maintainer posted the package should be treated as DFSG compliant to the
debian-legal.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2011/09/msg00010.html and uploaded
it to the main area.  It was accepted.  This mecab-ipadic package
follows this new precedent.

Thanks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (10, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

I may be wrong but, I thought, dak does not handle transition from
non-free to main gracefully.  That was the reason behind my bug report.

I trust you and wait by not doing anything  ... thanks for explanation.

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:50:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I don't think there's anything for us to do here.  Or for you to do,
> other than be patient.
> 
> $ grep-excuses mecab-ipadic
> mecab-ipadic (2.7.0+20070801-3 to 2.7.0-20070801+main-1)
>     Maintainer: Osamu Aoki
>     Too young, only 2 of 10 days old
>     Not considered
> 
> The only reason the non-free version's still in testing is because
> you only uploaded the new version a couple of days ago.  Leave it a
> few more days and everything will sort itself out.  (We could age
> the package to get it in to testing quicker.  I haven't because I
> took one look at the size of the diff and ran away.)


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to