Your message dated Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:32:55 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#633274: fixed in rep-gtk 1:0.90.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #633274,
regarding rep-gtk: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
633274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633274
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rep-gtk
Version: 1:0.90.0-2
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: la-file-removal

 To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of the dependency_libs variable.

http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html

Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script:

http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt

The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this
post to debian-devel:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html

To generate the list of packages, I've used:

grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1

The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you
have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was
parsed.

rep-gtk (1:0.90.0-2) appears in this list as a source package because
one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain
.la files.

In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process
behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further
dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your
package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the
dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once
rep-gtk is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which
you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that
packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs.

If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the
dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for
clarification.
-- 

Neil Williams
=============
[email protected]
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rep-gtk
Source-Version: 1:0.90.0-2.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rep-gtk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rep-gtk-gnome_0.90.0-2.1_all.deb
  to main/r/rep-gtk/rep-gtk-gnome_0.90.0-2.1_all.deb
rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/r/rep-gtk/rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.debian.tar.gz
rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.dsc
  to main/r/rep-gtk/rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.dsc
rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1_amd64.deb
  to main/r/rep-gtk/rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alessio Treglia <[email protected]> (supplier of updated rep-gtk package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:50:54 +0200
Source: rep-gtk
Binary: rep-gtk rep-gtk-gnome
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1:0.90.0-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Alessio Treglia <[email protected]>
Description: 
 rep-gtk    - GTK+ binding for librep
 rep-gtk-gnome - Dummy package for transition
Closes: 633274
Changes: 
 rep-gtk (1:0.90.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Get rid of unneeded .la files (Closes: #633274)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 67e056fe5a1d3dace43bb440515ca884128469b4 1988 rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.dsc
 2af44392580e38f043a1ade3649865a514043d5c 4808 rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.debian.tar.gz
 f3d458ee710a7e3c480f9b0c285eb3e643c51011 4198 rep-gtk-gnome_0.90.0-2.1_all.deb
 c64a71fb410ac4f836923ed69bb58026b6573447 1146054 rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 5debd335ba3c95bf20dd8243f23e43e93c53949c017470dc2d3439512b87c296 1988 
rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.dsc
 4502b3c5a6c1d9572596edea24754791c323fa2eba62903fb485c01a26b4bd61 4808 
rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.debian.tar.gz
 9d84027dc121bedb62a9df465ead669cc600c5dfd8f77820d3abeded83e604e6 4198 
rep-gtk-gnome_0.90.0-2.1_all.deb
 4484c807ad4e8630fbd7c2378d7e4b401fc5754eabf46f862d35e5dffa6a8b32 1146054 
rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 d1d4fc6990e19387f9e193fe5416231b 1988 lisp optional rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.dsc
 25b5b91072f71c71206b1bc6906558b2 4808 lisp optional 
rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1.debian.tar.gz
 68cca2e9cd13ecf2f132de120d85280b 4198 lisp extra 
rep-gtk-gnome_0.90.0-2.1_all.deb
 b2f89dc0bcb1952dec0a706531d712ec 1146054 lisp optional 
rep-gtk_0.90.0-2.1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=e6R2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to