Your message dated Mon, 9 Jul 2012 14:20:36 +0200
with message-id 
<CAE2SPAa6HOYAN62feNPiYq=5+52fwSnvhsXX==teu1hnk04...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Done with recent version of imagemagick
has caused the Debian Bug report #674097,
regarding Buggy output with -layers OptimizeFrame
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
674097: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674097
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: imagemagick
Version: 8:6.7.4.0-5
Severity: normal

Somewhere between 6.6.* and 6.7.*, something went wrong with convert's
-layers OptimizeFrame. When assembling an animated .gif from a series of
images (all of exactly the same dimensions), when -layers OptimizeFrame
is specified, an extraneous border is added to the right and bottom
edges of the resulting .gif. When -layers OptimizeFrame is omitted, the
resulting .gif has the same dimensions as the input frames, as expected.

This extraneous border is sometimes white, sometimes black.

Example buggy output:

        convert -delay 150 /usr/share/icons/gnome/48x48/mimetypes/libreoffice-* 
-layers OptimizeFrame /tmp/test.gif
        identify /tmp/test.gif

All input files are 48x48, but the resulting .gif has dimensions 60x66.
This is wrong, since optimizing frames should never increase the size of
the original input frames.  If -layers OptimizeFrame is omitted, then
the output is normal (48x48).

If the input files have transparency, the border is black -- very
noticeably buggy output.


T

-- 
It's bad luck to be superstitious. -- YHL



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: imagemagick
Version: 8:6.7.7.10-2

here the output of your bug with recent unstable version:
/tmp/test.gif[0] GIF 38x48 48x48+6+0 8-bit PseudoClass 8c 28.3KB 0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[1] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 32c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[2] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 64c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[3] GIF 48x44 48x48+0+2 8-bit PseudoClass 256c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[4] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 32c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[5] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 64c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[6] GIF 40x48 48x48+4+0 8-bit PseudoClass 128c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[7] GIF 40x48 48x48+4+0 8-bit PseudoClass 128c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[8] GIF 39x44 48x48+3+1 8-bit PseudoClass 256c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[9] GIF 40x48 48x48+4+0 8-bit PseudoClass 256c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[10] GIF 24x22 48x48+12+18 8-bit PseudoClass 64c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[11] GIF 40x48 48x48+4+0 8-bit PseudoClass 256c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[12] GIF 39x44 48x48+3+1 8-bit PseudoClass 128c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[13] GIF 40x48 48x48+4+0 8-bit PseudoClass 256c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[14] GIF 39x44 48x48+3+1 8-bit PseudoClass 128c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[15] GIF 40x48 48x48+4+0 8-bit PseudoClass 256c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[16] GIF 39x44 48x48+3+1 8-bit PseudoClass 128c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[17] GIF 40x48 48x48+4+0 8-bit PseudoClass 128c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[18] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 64c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[19] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 64c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[20] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 64c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[21] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 64c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[22] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 32c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000
/tmp/test.gif[23] GIF 42x48 48x48+2+0 8-bit PseudoClass 32c 28.3KB
0.000u 0:00.000

Work for me

Thanks


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to