Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:11:21 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#681333: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #681333,
regarding RM: mecab-cannadic -- ROM; not useful any more
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
681333: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681333
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

====
This was discussed on http://bugs.debian.org/639371 and mail as below.

Since Nobuyuki seems not familiar with removal request, i am doing this
now.  we just had mail exchange as below:

I am asking package removal with this mail instead of replying in private mail.

Regards,

Osamu

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:45:16PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Hi Osamu, Hi Takatsugu,
>
> mecab-cannadic in Sid curretly suffers a FTBFS [1] as did
> ipadic [2] before Osamu fixed it with my patch.
>
> I submitted a very similar patch for mecab-cannadic, but given the
> last comments in [3] I am not sure that it's really worth an NMU and
> should be removed from Sid and Wheezy instead?
>
> Do you have any strong feelings in either direction? As my Japanese is
> limited to baka, neko and kawaii, I have no use for the package so you
> should better decide here on your own :)
>
> Regards
> Evgeni
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680827
> [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680834
> [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639371


On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:26:19AM +0900, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote:
> At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:45:16 +0200,
> Evgeni Golov wrote:
> >
> > Hi Osamu, Hi Takatsugu,
> >
> > mecab-cannadic in Sid curretly suffers a FTBFS [1] as did
> > ipadic [2] before Osamu fixed it with my patch.
> >
> > I submitted a very similar patch for mecab-cannadic, but given the
> > last comments in [3] I am not sure that it's really worth an NMU and
> > should be removed from Sid and Wheezy instead?
>
> mecab-cannadic was made to make mecab as main package, because
> mecab-ipadic had treated non-free package.
>
>
> Now mecab-ipadic is in main, so there is no reason to keep maintain
> mecab-cannadic, I think. So dropping the package is acceptable for me.






--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

chasen-cannadic |  0.94h-2.1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, 
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
mecab-cannadic |  0.94h-2.1 | source

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; not useful any more
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org
included) until the next dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically.  But please check all old bugs, if they where closed
correctly or should have been re-assign to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/681333

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to