Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:26:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333910: No openswan in "testing" (i386), while exists in
stable and unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 12:00:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 05:00:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vol75-6-82-228-67-28.fbx.proxad.net (aleph.bacbuc.fdn.fr)
[82.228.67.28] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQOEu-0000Bj-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:00:44 -0700
Received: from yod.bacbuc.fdn.fr
([193.57.55.5] helo=yod ident=mail)
by aleph.bacbuc.fdn.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EQOEr-0001Pg-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:00:41 +0200
Received: from charpent by yod with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EQOEk-0005gO-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:00:34 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Emmanuel Charpentier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: No openswan in "testing" (i386), while exists in stable and unstable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:00:33 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: freeswan
Severity: wishlist
The openswan package exists in both unstable and stable, but not in
testing (at least on i386). This sounds extremely curious : while I am not
an expert on Debian distribution system, ISTU that testing should have
either the old "stable" version or, after a while without critical bugs,
the new "unstable" version.
Is there a stumbling block specific to testing ?
Are there plans to get this package back to testing ?
Sincerely,
Emmanuel Charpentier
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12ec
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 333910-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 17:27:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 10:27:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jupiter.gibraltar.at [195.248.46.157]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQTKm-0006Fz-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:27:09 -0700
Received: from localhost (jupiter.gibraltar.at [127.0.0.1])
by jupiter.gibraltar.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279AC180A860
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:26:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jupiter.gibraltar.at ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (jupiter [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 20510-10; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [2002?5397?efa6?1?24f?4eff?fe10?7bf1] (unknown
[IPv6:2002:5397:efa6:1:24f:4eff:fe10:7bf1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by jupiter.gibraltar.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFCD18062F6;
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Emmanuel Charpentier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#333910: No openswan in "testing" (i386), while exists in
stable and unstable
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:26:25 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1179257.h0aZHSzZm9";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at gibraltar.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart1179257.h0aZHSzZm9
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Am Friday 14 October 2005 13:00 schrieb Emmanuel Charpentier:
> Is there a stumbling block specific to testing ?
At the moment it will be the libssl0.9.8 transition.
> Are there plans to get this package back to testing ?
Definitly, but filing bug reports against this package will not help with=20
that.... Closing this bug report now, since it is not really a bug in the=20
package, but it is just waiting for the libssl transition (and enough=20
non-RC-bugs days to enter testing).
Rene
--nextPart1179257.h0aZHSzZm9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDT+pDq7SPDcPCS94RAqOmAKC52OmNawS+iJzUCHSmMm7EFXgImwCgyH2L
w8QPYI6vPFLhcgrDayAXsLg=
=SAYM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1179257.h0aZHSzZm9--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
