Your message dated Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:04:30 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#656345: postmark: Invalid url in the package's 
description
has caused the Debian Bug report #656345,
regarding postmark: Invalid url in the package's description
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
656345: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656345
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: postmark
Version: 1.51-7
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

In the package's description, the url 

http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/postmark.html

is no more valid on Netapp's website.

There is no alternative url available on the website.

I don't find any reference to this software at Netapp, maybe no more
supported and this package has to be market as 'obsolete' ?

Regards

[Alain Belkadi]

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 656345 1.53-1
thanks

Hello Alain,

Am Mittwoch, den 18.01.2012, 17:30 +0100 schrieb Alain Belkadi:

> In the package's description, the url 
> 
> http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/postmark.html
> 
> is no more valid on Netapp's website.

Yes. I removed this URL because of 404.

> There is no alternative url available on the website.

Yes.

> I don't find any reference to this software at Netapp, maybe no more
> supported and this package has to be market as 'obsolete' ?

I just uploaded 1.53 which was found by a Debian user which should be in
sid tomorrow.:)
It is still usefull to benchmark.

-- 
Noël Köthe <[email protected]>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to