Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:26:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#99284: [PATCH] Mesa fails to strip correctly on Alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2001 18:52:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 13:52:13 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl092-073-086.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (spawn.hockeyfiend.com) 
[66.92.73.86] (mail)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 155B4n-0003Ie-00; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:52:13 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=chris)
        by spawn.hockeyfiend.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 155B4m-0001sp-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 May 2001 14:52:12 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 14:52:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Christopher C. Chimelis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] Mesa fails to strip correctly on Alpha
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Package: mesa
Version: 3.4.2.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch

When calling strip on Alpha during packaging, it seems that the .comment
section is already removed by --strip-unneeded, so it can't find the
section when it goes to strip the binaries.  I've patched the rules file
to remove the stripping option for the .comment section on Alpha only (so
that you still have expected behaviour on other archs).  Here's the patch:

diff -burN mesa-3.4.2.1/debian/rules mesa-patched/debian/rules
--- mesa-3.4.2.1/debian/rules   Wed May 30 13:58:25 2001
+++ mesa-patched/debian/rules   Wed May 30 13:58:14 2001
@@ -30,7 +30,11 @@
 endif
 ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
 INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH), alpha)
+STRIP_LIB       := strip --strip-unneeded --remove-section .note 
+else
 STRIP_LIB       := strip --strip-unneeded --remove-section .note 
--remove-section .comment
+endif
 else
 STRIP_LIB       := :
 endif


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 99284-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 19:26:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 12:26:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ERE9n-0006br-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:26:55 -0700
Received: from [84.59.213.105] (helo=juist)
        by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
        (WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
        id 1ERE9I-0003EN-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:26:24 +0200
Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1ERE9H-0002kx-S3
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:26:23 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#99284: [PATCH] Mesa fails to strip correctly on Alpha
From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Face: "iUeUu$b*W_"w?tV83Y3*r:`rh&dRv}$YnZ3,LVeCZSYVuf[Gpo*5%_=/\_!gc_,SS}[~xZ
 wY77I-M)xHIx:2f56g%/`SOw"Dx%4Xq0&f\Tj~>|QR|vGlU}TBYhiG(K:2<T^
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:26:23 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (cilantro, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi,

this doesn't seem to be a problem with the current package anymore (at
least they build fine with the buildd).

-- 
        Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to