Your message dated Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:13:16 +0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: yagf: Graphics resize button "+" won't enlarge a small
image.
has caused the Debian Bug report #665912,
regarding yagf: Graphics resize button "+" won't enlarge a small image.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
665912: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665912
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: yagf
Version: 0.9+svn247-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
I ran 'yagf' for OCR on an error message screenshot, (371 x 125,
8-bit), but the middle graphics pane's display of the image was too
small to read. Clicking "+" didn't enlarge the image, and "-" made the
image even smaller, (after which "+" did work, but only up to the
initial small size).
Of course one could resize the image in an external program,
but it'd be less inconvenient.
A "resize to fit window" button might also be useful.
HTH...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages yagf depends on:
ii libaspell15 0.60.7~20110707-1
ii libc6 2.13-27
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.3-1
ii libqtcore4 4:4.7.4-2
ii libqtgui4 4:4.7.4-2
ii libstdc++6 4.6.3-1
ii tesseract-ocr 3.02.01-2
Versions of packages yagf recommends:
ii xsane 0.998-3
yagf suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Developer replied:
> As the correct recognition is possible only staring from something like 300
> dpi resolution, it is not very useful to make the image zoomed larger than
> its original size. My goal was to sped up the loading/display of large images
> (>300 dpi) that are generted by scanning full pages. WontFix for now.
--- End Message ---
