Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:35:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please provide more plugins for catalyst
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 15:19:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 08:19:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (tnc.hk) [203.86.167.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEq6B-0004ch-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:19:59 -0700
Received: from delta.tnc.hk (unknown [202.83.245.124])
by tnc.hk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F9A46574
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:20:03 +0800 (HKT)
Received: by delta.tnc.hk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8A2E4A231E; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:19:51 +0800 (HKT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alan Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please provide more plugins for catalyst
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:19:51 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libcatalyst-perl
Version: 5.33-1
Severity: wishlist
Upstream provides a lot of plugins:
http://cpansearch.perl.org/~mramberg/Catalyst-5.33/lib/Catalyst/Manual/Plugins.pod
Can they be packaged as well?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (50, 'unstable'), (50, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-5-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages libcatalyst-perl depends on:
ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.19-2 Automated accessor generator
ii libclass-data-inheritable-per 0.02-1 Inheritable, overridable class dat
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.45-2 A collection of modules that parse
ii libmodule-pluggable-fast-perl 0.16-1 Fast plugins with instantiation
ii libpath-class-perl 0.12-1 Cross-platform path specification
ii libtemplate-perl 2.14-1 template processing system written
ii libtext-asciitable-perl 0.15-1 Perm module to create a table usin
ii libtree-simple-perl 1.14-1 A simple tree object
ii libtree-simple-visitorfactory 0.05-1 A collection of dispensing visitor
ii libuniversal-exports-perl 0.03-7 Lightweight, universal exporting o
ii liburi-perl 1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii libwww-perl 5.803-4 WWW client/server library for Perl
ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327862-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 02:35:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 19:35:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fry.debianforum.de (mail.debianforum.de) [213.239.213.245]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERKqR-0002je-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:35:24 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA78B1C0A7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:35:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.debianforum.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.debianforum.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 20302-09 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:35:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wall.foobar.lan (p54B497E8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.180.151.232])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC683B1C0A4
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:35:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from florian by wall.foobar.lan with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ERKqK-00059F-T7
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:35:17 +0200
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:35:16 +0200
From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please provide more plugins for catalyst
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y"
Content-Disposition: inline
Priority: normal
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.7-1-686
X-Binford: 5100 (more power)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at debianforum.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
the bug is a bit more general, but because those modules you requested
are in the pool now I am closing this bug now. If you need to have
another module please open a new bug about it.
-Flo
--=20
BOFH excuse #312:
incompatible bit-registration operators
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDUw3kdC8qQo5jWl4RAsNqAJ93+trPzCPH1hAJQcrGlgCFGij1wACeLsLR
SRb1offumGEpUTbra67v4Ag=
=z2ab
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
