Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:07:02 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line num-utils: 'numgrep /10..4/' returns no error has caused the Debian Bug report #429436, regarding num-utils: 'numgrep /10..4/' returns no error. to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 429436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429436 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: num-utils Version: 0.5-8 Severity: minor At present this probably ought to return an error: % seq 1 3 30 | numgrep /10..4/ ; echo $? 0 OTOH, it'd be more convenient if the ranges didn't have to be of this form: /lownum..highnum/ ...but instead worked either way: /lownum..highnum/ /highnum..lownum/ Number position would only matter if there's one number. It's trivial to code; if the first number is greater, swap the numbers. Hope this helps... -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages num-utils depends on: ii perl 5.8.8-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction num-utils recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---I think that I have sufficiently explained my opinion. This can be discussed further with upstream.
--- End Message ---
