Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:57:52 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#687775: RM: dsc-statistics -- RoQA; RC buggy, low
popcon
has caused the Debian Bug report #687775,
regarding RM: dsc-statistics -- RoQA; RC buggy, low popcon
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
687775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687775
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Initially, the RC bug against dsc-statistics was marked
wontfix but has since been ignored with the insistence
on the submitter sending a tested and documented patch
instead of the maintainer actually maintaining the
package.
One month after I warned about the package needing to
be removed if this bug is not fixed, nothing has
happened with the issue.
Please remove dsc-statistics from Debian.
--
Neil Williams
=============
[email protected]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
* Neil Williams <[email protected]> [120915 19:13]:
> Initially, the RC bug against dsc-statistics was marked
> wontfix but has since been ignored with the insistence
> on the submitter sending a tested and documented patch
> instead of the maintainer actually maintaining the
> package.
>
> One month after I warned about the package needing to
> be removed if this bug is not fixed, nothing has
> happened with the issue.
>
> Please remove dsc-statistics from Debian.
That package is surely is rc bugy and the reaction of the maintainer
is certainly suboptimal. However, that alone doesn't require the
package to be removed from the archive. It surely should be removed
from testing (but that's done by the release team), but there are other
ways in Debian to deal with bad maintainership: NMU, QA uploads, orphan,
or even the ctte.
Best regards,
Alexander
--- End Message ---
