Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:14:16 +0200 with message-id <20121001151416.GA12956@nebkha> and subject line Re: Bug#681397: fs2ram: typo in description: suc*h* has caused the Debian Bug report #681397, regarding fs2ram: typo in description: suc*h* to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 681397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681397 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: fs2ram Version: 0.1 Severity: normal Dear Debian folks, the following paragraph of the description contains a spelling error. This package provides two pre-unmount scripts designed to preserve folder structure and file permissions across reboots: this is needed to allow hierarchies suc as /var/cache or /var/log to be mounted as tmpfs. s,suc,such, Reading it again s,reboots:,reboots., could also be fixed. Thanks, Paul PS: Unfortunately your package does not provide a homepage field and no VCS tags are there either. Providing a patch would be easier if the package was maintained in a public repository. But this should be a separate report. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-rc6 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, Thanks for reporting this bug. This bug has been fixed in the version 0.3.12. > PS: Unfortunately your package does not provide a homepage field and no > VCS tags are there either. Providing a patch would be easier if the > package was maintained in a public repository. There is a public repository[1] but I forgot to add it in debian/control. I'll do it in the next version. [1] http://git.onagre.fdn.fr/git/fs2ram Cheers, -- Philippe Le Brouster
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
