Your message dated Fri, 2 Nov 2012 19:41:40 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#692149: xulrunner-16.0: depends on libnspr4 AND
(instead of OR) libnspr4-0d
has caused the Debian Bug report #692149,
regarding xulrunner-16.0: depends on libnspr4 AND (instead of OR) libnspr4-0d
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
692149: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692149
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xulrunner-16.0
Version: 16.0.2-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
please change xulrunner's dependency from libnspr4 AND libnspr4-0d to
libnspr4 | libnspr4-0d (the second being the transitional package
for the first) like you already did with libnss3 | libnss3-1d.
Cheers
Armin
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 06:50:36PM +0100, Armin Haas wrote:
> Package: xulrunner-16.0
> Version: 16.0.2-1
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> please change xulrunner's dependency from libnspr4 AND libnspr4-0d to
> libnspr4 | libnspr4-0d (the second being the transitional package
> for the first) like you already did with libnss3 | libnss3-1d.
The dependencies are automatically generated, and older libnspr4-0d
doesnt contain the symbols xulrunner-16.0 requires. Adding a dependency
to a transitional package for the sake of it is useless.
Mike
--- End Message ---