Your message dated Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:40:14 -0800
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#693711: My bad.
has caused the Debian Bug report #693711,
regarding robotfindskitten: -n option does not work.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
693711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: robotfindskitten
Version: 1.7320508.406-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When running robotfindskitten with the -n[number] command line option, there is
only one item to find, "kitten."
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Architecture: armhf (armv6l)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.27+ (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages robotfindskitten depends on:
ii dpkg 1.16.8
ii install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-10
ii libc6 2.13-35
ii libncurses5 5.9-10
ii libtinfo5 5.9-10
robotfindskitten recommends no packages.
robotfindskitten suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 11/19/2012 11:02 AM, A Baumann wrote:
> I need to RTFS.
>
> This is what I get for having a user on my system that's playing with
> the code. Apparently, there's a future version that will require -n
> [number] instead of just robotfindskitten [number], and that made for an
> inaccurate man page on my local machine. robotfindskitten [number] works
> fine.
>
> This can probably be safely closed.
Yes, though robotfindskitten should ideally better handle invalid flags.
However, as you found out, rfk is currently in heavy development and
subject to a major rewrite, so I'm not going to worry about the existing
version unless major problems are discovered.
If you are interested in the development effort, I'd recommend joining
the rfk-dev list:
http://robotfindskitten.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rfk-dev
RF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
