Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:05:22 +0100
with message-id
<cadk7b0n2rqc002xfq4frnmoa9qr3p0l3gijtvucyuppfebf...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#688507: ftp.debian.org: Please make DM permission
changes public
has caused the Debian Bug report #688507,
regarding ftp.debian.org: Please make DM permission changes public
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
688507: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688507
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
while the new DM permission handling is a great improvement, I am missing a
public
information source about changes in maintainer handling. I do not mean the
complete DM permission lists (i.e. http://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt) but
permission changes becoming effective including the advocate who did.
The easiest and perfectly acceptable solution would be to send processed
*.commands
file including its GPG signature to debian-devel-changes, just like the way dak
does for
*.changes files. That would also provide comments the advocate possibly included
in his advocation command. Alternatively, I guess I could also live with the
person's fingerprint next to an individual package wo emitted that change
(although that may miss "Deny" changes which I find important, too).
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
http://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt now lists key fingerprint of who
signed the request.
--- End Message ---
