Your message dated Sun, 13 Jan 2013 07:46:58 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#697980: fuse: Reintroduce fuse-utils transitional
package to fuse until after the wheezy release
has caused the Debian Bug report #697980,
regarding fuse: Reintroduce fuse-utils transitional package to fuse until after
the wheezy release
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
697980: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697980
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fuse
Version: 2.9.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: makes various packages in unstable uninstallable
Hi Daniel
Please reintroduce the fuse-utils transitional package in unstable
until the wheezy release happened. Else 13 packages with Depends, 5
with Recommends on fuse-utils are uninstallable in sid, and 1 has
Suggests on fuse-utils.
See [1,2].
[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00264.html
[2]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00265.html
Thanks in advance and regards,
Salvatore
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
severity 697980 wishlist
thanks
On 01/12/2013 01:27 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Please reintroduce the fuse-utils transitional package in unstable
until the wheezy release happened.
i disagree.
this is sid only, there is no need to do anything about it for wheezy.
Else 13 packages with Depends, 5
with Recommends on fuse-utils are uninstallable in sid, and 1 has
Suggests on fuse-utils.
the only packages with problems in sid are those that declare a depends
on fuse-utils (recommends or suggests are a 'cosmetical' problem in sid
only), limiting this to the following 14 binary packages on current
sid/i386:
acetoneiso, djmount, fuseext2, fusefat, fuseiso9660, fusesmb,
glusterfs-client, ifuse, ltspfs, mhddfs, mtpfs, obexfs, unionfs-fuse,
wikipediafs,
these packages had time since may 2011 to adapt.
should one of these packages need an update in sid *and* need to go to
wheezy too, the simple additional change (s/fuse-utils/fuse/) that would
be in the diff doesn't matter either.
these are normal sid bugs regardless if we're before or after the wheezy
release, people should consider finaly updating their packages in sid,
even if it's only a s/fuse/fuse-utils/ change, after 1.5 years.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: [email protected]
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--- End Message ---
