Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:14:00 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line [[email protected]: Accepted accessodf 0.1-2 (source all)]
has caused the Debian Bug report #684922,
regarding accessodf: please change to unzipped oxt in
/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
684922: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684922
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: accessodf
Version: 0.1-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
since OpenOffice.org 3.3 (and this LO 3.3 in Debian( there exists a directory
/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions which contain the extensions unpacked.
That saves a unopkg call to (de)register the extensions in post*/pre* but dpkg
just adds/removes it.
A trigger then just preregisters this for startup performance (which is not
100% needed) when it detects stuff changing there.
All extension packages in Debian follow this, please adapt accessodf.
Also helps with #679717 ad the post*/pre* causing this then are gone.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages accessodf depends on:
ii default-jre 1:1.6-47
pn libcommons-collections-java <none>
ii libreoffice-writer 1:3.6.0-1
accessodf recommends no packages.
accessodf suggests no packages.
Regards,
Rene
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
seems to be done in 0.1-2 but this bug wasn't closed. Doing. :)
Regards,
Rene
----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Humenda <[email protected]> -----
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:32:28 +0000
From: Sebastian Humenda <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Accepted accessodf 0.1-2 (source all)
Reply-To: [email protected]
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:01:52 +0200
Source: accessodf
Binary: accessodf
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Humenda <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Sebastian Humenda <[email protected]>
Description:
accessodf - Libreoffice extension to check accessibility of ODF documents
Closes: 679717
Changes:
accessodf (0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* {pre,post}{inst|rm}: removed. The cleaner (now working) solution is to
just unzip the package. This method won't leave unowned files behind.
(Closes: #679717)
Checksums-Sha1:
59f9426dbf543dc8d32ceec0f2dbec9898afd2f7 1871 accessodf_0.1-2.dsc
b8863de22dca42d52815181eb868f1fd8a83a365 5614 accessodf_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
d45f708a692daf01f84d38e27e07b829d7e1e824 239470 accessodf_0.1-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
f989205ff1f2180cca84e199b16c900288a00c04712996a47731926d2a9acc13 1871
accessodf_0.1-2.dsc
0bc84d312cb533f2547f89248ec15947c16382ac5181fee9581ec03ccbf98975 5614
accessodf_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
79c08322e5f1b38ae06cb9727686e4ab1f0590a86115023a2ac5b2e24c15c69b 239470
accessodf_0.1-2_all.deb
Files:
2644a96589999509be6b922d2da4fb37 1871 java extra accessodf_0.1-2.dsc
6f2c7c29c2a14514a840981009029708 5614 java extra accessodf_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
e36748f72ae783d3db1b459e7f233d77 239470 java extra accessodf_0.1-2_all.deb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
----- End forwarded message -----
--- End Message ---
