Your message dated Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:18:32 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#441961: "installLocation has no properties" error in 
nsExtensionManager.js during install/update of extensions
has caused the Debian Bug report #441961,
regarding "installLocation has no properties" error in nsExtensionManager.js 
during install/update of extensions
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
441961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=441961
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.4.dfsg1-2
Severity: normal

I have got the same error in Icedove as is described in the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/65609 except that the line of the error now is 3940. I did not try applying the patch reported there yet but I think it should work.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:       Linux 2.6.22-2-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  990 unstable        honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de
  990 unstable        debian.ethz.ch
  300 experimental    debian.ethz.ch

--- Package information. ---
Depends                           (Version) | Installed
===========================================-+-======================
fontconfig                                  | 2.4.2-1.2
psmisc                                      | 22.5-1
debianutils                       (>= 1.16) | 2.23.1
libatk1.0-0                     (>= 1.13.2) | 1.18.0-2
libc6                            (>= 2.6-1) | 2.6.1-3
libcairo2                        (>= 1.4.0) | 1.4.10-1
libfontconfig1                   (>= 2.4.0) | 2.4.2-1.2
libfreetype6                     (>= 2.3.5) | 2.3.5-1+b1
libgcc1                 (>= 1:4.2-20070516) | 1:4.2.1-5
libglib2.0-0                    (>= 2.14.0) | 2.14.0-2
libgtk2.0-0                  (>= 2.10.12-3) | 2.10.13-1
libhunspell-1.1-0              (>= 1.1.6-1) | 1.1.9-1
libjpeg62                                   | 6b-14
libnspr4-0d                   (>= 1.8.0.10) | 4.6.7-1
libnss3-0d                      (>= 3.11.7) | 3.11.7-1
libpango1.0-0                   (>= 1.16.5) | 1.18.1-1
libpng12-0                    (>= 1.2.13-4) | 1.2.15~beta5-2
libstdc++6                (>= 4.2-20070516) | 4.2.1-5
libx11-6                                    | 2:1.0.3-7
libxcursor1                      (>> 1.1.2) | 1:1.1.9-1
libxext6                                    | 1:1.0.3-2
libxfixes3                     (>= 1:4.0.1) | 1:4.0.3-2
libxft2                          (>> 2.1.1) | 2.1.12-2
libxi6                                      | 2:1.1.3-1
libxinerama1                                | 1:1.0.2-1
libxrandr2                     (>= 2:1.2.0) | 2:1.2.2-1
libxrender1                                 | 1:0.9.3-1
libxt6                                      | 1:1.0.5-3
zlib1g                (>= 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-1) | 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-5



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.5-1

Am 05.02.2013 07:52, schrieb David Andel:
> Hi Carsten
> 
> Yes, you can close the bug, I haven't seen this in a while.
> 
> Regards,
> David
> 
> On 04.02.2013 22:50, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>> Hello David,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:56:21AM +0200, David Andel wrote:
>>> Package: icedove
>>> Version: 2.0.0.4.dfsg1-2
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> I have got the same error in Icedove as is described in the bug
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/65609 except that the line
>>> of the error now is 3940.
>>> I did not try applying the patch reported there yet but I think it
>>> should work.
>>
>> is this bug still present in current versions? I think this is obsolet
>> in actual versions and this bug could be closed.
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
> 

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Carsten Schönert

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to