Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:57:05 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#702803: virtualbox-4.2: modprobe vboxnetflt failed in
4.2.8-83876~Debian~wheezy with Kernel 3.8-1~experimental.1 x86_64
has caused the Debian Bug report #702803,
regarding virtualbox-4.2: modprobe vboxnetflt failed in
4.2.8-83876~Debian~wheezy with Kernel 3.8-1~experimental.1 x86_64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
702803: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702803
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: virtualbox-4.2
Version: 4.2.8-83876~Debian~wheezy
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
virtualbox-4.2 is not able to modprobe the vboxnetflt module for the Kernel
3.8.
dmesg output lke required by the error message:
vboxdrv: Found 8 processor cores.
vboxdrv: fAsync=0 offMin=0x1bf offMax=0x1ec9
vboxdrv: TSC mode is 'synchronous', kernel timer mode is 'normal'.
vboxdrv: Successfully loaded version 4.2.8 (interface 0x001a0004).
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol skb_copy_bits
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol skb_copy_bits (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol skb_put
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol skb_put (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol dev_queue_xmit
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol dev_queue_xmit (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol consume_skb
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol consume_skb (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol __netif_schedule
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol __netif_schedule (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol dev_add_pack
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol dev_add_pack (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol dev_set_promiscuity
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol dev_set_promiscuity (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol eth_type_trans
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol eth_type_trans (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol kfree_skb
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol kfree_skb (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol skb_checksum_help
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol skb_checksum_help (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol dev_remove_pack
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol dev_remove_pack (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol skb_push
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol skb_push (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol netif_rx_ni
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol netif_rx_ni (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol __netdev_alloc_skb
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol __netdev_alloc_skb (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol netif_carrier_off
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol netif_carrier_off (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol skb_copy
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol skb_copy (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol netif_carrier_on
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol netif_carrier_on (err -22)
vboxnetflt: disagrees about version of symbol skb_gso_segment
vboxnetflt: Unknown symbol skb_gso_segment (err -22)
locally installed kernel packets:
dpkg -l linux* | grep ii
linux-base 3.5
linux-headers-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.35-2
linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common 3.2.35-2
linux-headers-3.8-trunk-amd64 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
linux-headers-3.8-trunk-common 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
linux-headers-amd64 3.2+46
linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.35-2
linux-image-3.8-trunk-amd64 3.8-1~experimental.1
linux-image-amd64 3.2+46
linux-kbuild-3.2 3.2.17-1
linux-kbuild-3.8 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
linux-libc-dev:amd64 3.2.35-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (90, 'experimental'), (90, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.8-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages virtualbox-4.2 depends on:
ii adduser 3.113+nmu3
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.49
ii libc6 2.13-38
ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.26.0-1+wheezy1
ii libdevmapper1.02.1 2:1.02.74-6
ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-5
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 8.0.5-3
ii libpng12-0 1.2.49-1
ii libpython2.7 2.7.3-6
ii libqt4-network 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii libqt4-opengl 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.15-5
ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-1
ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-5
ii libx11-6 2:1.5.0-1
ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.13-1
ii libxext6 2:1.3.1-2
ii libxinerama1 2:1.1.2-1
ii libxml2 2.8.0+dfsg1-7+nmu1
ii libxmu6 2:1.1.1-1
ii libxt6 1:1.1.3-1
ii psmisc 22.19-1+deb7u1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
Versions of packages virtualbox-4.2 recommends:
ii binutils 2.22-8
ii dkms 2.2.0.3-1.2
ii evince [pdf-viewer] 3.4.0-3.1
ii gcc 4:4.7.2-1
ii gv [pdf-viewer] 1:3.7.3-1
ii libasound2 1.0.25-4
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 8.0.5-3
ii libpulse0 2.0-6
ii libsdl-ttf2.0-0 2.0.11-2
ii linux-headers-3.2.0-4-amd64 [linux-headers] 3.2.35-2
ii linux-headers-3.8-trunk-amd64 [linux-headers] 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
ii linux-headers-amd64 [linux-headers] 3.2+46
ii make 3.81-8.2
ii python-central 0.6.17
virtualbox-4.2 suggests no packages.
-- debconf information:
virtualbox/old-installation-found:
virtualbox/module-compilation-allowed: true
virtualbox/delete-old-modules: true
virtualbox/old-running:
virtualbox/group-vboxusers:
virtualbox/module-compilation-failed:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Amie Wang <[email protected]> writes:
> Package: virtualbox-4.2
> Version: 4.2.8-83876~Debian~wheezy
> Severity: normal
The virtualbox-4.2 package does not originate from Debian (we have
virtualbox-ose, which is at version 4.1.18-dfsg-2+deb7u1). Please report
this problem upstream, or if it happens with the virtualbox-ose package
in Debian proper, then to Debian, but against the correct package.
Since the package is not in Debian, there is nothing we can do about it,
therefore I am closing this report now.
--
|8]
--- End Message ---
