Your message dated Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:25:37 +0200
with message-id
<cakcboksyepdgb2efuhf67haj4yzryyrrbv1pte1ptbo88t-...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #666180,
regarding [libwt-dev] libwt-dev should depend on latest boost libraries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
666180: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libwt-dev
Version: 3.1.10-1
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
When developing with both Wt libraries and Boost libraries, the linker will
give a warning of a conflict with an older Boost version, like, e.g.,
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libboost_thread.so.1.46.1, needed by
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../lib/libwt.so, may conflict
with
libboost_thread.so.1.49.0
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libboost_system.so.1.46.1, needed by
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../lib/libwt.so, may conflict
with
libboost_system.so.1.49.0
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libboost_program_options.so.1.46.1, needed by
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../lib/libwthttp.so, may
conflict
with libboost_program_options.so.1.49.0
although it links, the program crashes. I guess the warning mentioned above
should not appear. It is not possible to compile a program for different
Boost
versions at the same time.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
500 unstable ftp.nl.debian.org
500 stable ceph.newdream.net
--- Package information. ---
Package's Depends field is empty.
Package's Recommends field is empty.
Package's Suggests field is empty.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Nothing to do. The dependencies were already right, as I explained in my
previous e-mail.
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
--- End Message ---
