Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:39:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line yelp: Replace mozilla-browser dependency with www-browser
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 08:24:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 01:24:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vsmtp2alice.tin.it (vsmtp2.tin.it) [212.216.176.142]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHzuM-00073h-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 01:24:50 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (82.48.36.66) by vsmtp2.tin.it (7.2.060.1)
id 432F18C1000C52FC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:24:15
+0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: yelp: Replace mozilla-browser dependency with www-browser
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:24:16 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.4 required=4.0 tests=ADDR_FREE,BAYES_00,
HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: yelp
Version: 2.10.0-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've noticed that since version 2.10.0-1 yelp depends on
mozilla-browser, would a dependency on www-browser be enough?
In my case I'd like to have yelp and mozilla-firefox (which Provides:
www-browser) both installed, but NOT mozilla-browser.
Cheers,
Free
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329337-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 19:39:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 12:39:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.27]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EVDav-0004aG-00; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:39:25 -0700
Received: from bee.dooz.org (levallois.dooz.org [81.57.180.178])
by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF535E1A3;
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:39:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 292A14F0231; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:39:52 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:39:52 +0200
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: yelp: Replace mozilla-browser dependency with www-browser
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
On mer, sep 21, 2005, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> I've noticed that since version 2.10.0-1 yelp depends on
> mozilla-browser, would a dependency on www-browser be enough?
I'm closing this bug, the discussion suggested that this is currently
necessary, and there are other bugs requesting:
- to build yelp against firefox
- to let yelp only depend on the embedded mozilla library
Cheers,
--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
